Posts Past & Random
1st Class On The Titanic... Just what is going on?

Jim Sorrell

article thumbnail
+ Full Story

Hemp, it's not just for smoking anymore!

Jeffree Benet

article thumbnailWhile progressives make progress on the legal front in ending prohibition (Prohibition is a great injury to the cause of temperance. It is a species of intemperance within itself, for it goes beyond...
+ Full Story

More Thinknovation
Home Section Blog
  

postheadericon Example of Section Blog layout (FAQ section)

postheadericon Green Roofs Project Overview Conference, Singapore

School of Art, Design and Media at Nanyang Technical University in Singapore

A conference which should be highly relevant to all building, environment and garden-related project professionals will be held twice this year in Singapore, first from the 19th to the 20th of August (2010) and from the 25th to the 26th of November.

Singapore, being a giant concrete heat sink right on the tropics, is eager to improve their environment for urban dwellers, so this topic is of great interest to them, as it should be to urban planners everywhere. The use of Green Roofs to mitigate the Urban Heat Island effect is something that should be pursued, whether government bodies, town planners, architects, developers and contractors... even educators and environmentalist should find this series of lectures and discussions of great interest, as it is one of the leading trends in the forthcoming Green Revolution.

To be held at the Hollandse Club in the Camden Road green district, they are offering an early bird special for those who register before August 12th of one additional seat for FREE! That is a S$1,380 value, the price per delegate, making it an effective 2-for1. Of course the fee covers lunches, refreshments and the course books.

Green Roofing or the use of plants for roof and sky-rise gardens is quickly growing in popularity around the world, a potent measure for mitigating heat corridors in hot climates. In these course, delegates will learn about the holistic approach to purposeful Green Rooftops, being much more than horticultural showcases, with integrated planning and innovative design they can not just save you money on cooling, but can generate revenues from agricultural proceeds.

A full panel of experts, including Dr Tan Puay Yok of the National Parks of Singapore and Dr Wong Nyuk Hien of the National University of Singapore will help you identify doable solutions and strategies to meet the functional requirements of your project and to incorporate the needs of the plants while appealing to the "green sense" of the host community.

And for an excellent read on the potential for Singapore, check out this article on GreenRoofs.com.


For more information, contact the Urban Greening Institute by phone +65 6546 5801, email This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or check out their website at www.urbangreeninginstitute.com

Add a comment
 

postheadericon Water on the Brain

don't buy bottled water

I was in the supermarket this morning (nothing unusual in that) and pushing my trolley to the checkout. Well, my wife was pushing and I was away in airy-fairy land when it suddenly dawned on me that I was walking past water. Not just any water but a whole world of the stuff. A complete representation of nations: a veritable United Nations of water in one aisle...

There, in your local Supermarket: Highland Spring Water all the way from Scotland or water drawn from the speckled valleys in the Black Mountains of the Canadian Rockies. Or you prefer Continental European? How about Spa Reine Water from Germany (hope it wasn't a public Spa) or Vittel from the French Societe Generale des Eaux Minerales de Vittel, whatever that is.

Even Australia is represented by Wattle Water - Pure Water from the Australian outback and complete with a sprinkling of dust. And from the Continent of Africa comes "Oasis Pure" shipped out from the Negrev by Camel Train. China and Japan had ambassadors at the Supermarket I attended and the pictures on the bottles looked great, but the price of $4.50 was pushing my ability to grasp the essentials behind buying water a bit far.

Yes, one can buy water from almost any place in the world right in your local shop. You can even get water from the Three Gorges Damn in China at your local Chinese Take-away, which is a bit weird as the dam was just completed.

How true the advertising of water is can be anybody's guess, but to me it seems a mite strange to ship small bottles of water half way across the world when a quite decent reservoir exists just up the road. I realize that in an effort to promote certain brands you can pay twice as much for water in a colorful green bottle or in a bottle shaped like a duck - but is it all so necessary.

The cost of this water is outrageous yet nobody seems to realize what they are actually doing when they faithfully buy bottled water everyday of the week. The way I see it is that people are buying water that comes from the other side of the world and costs them money that could be otherwise spent. Why not just go to the tap as we used to do and use the water from there? If concerned boil it, let it cool and put it in the fridge for later. That is what we used to do until all of these fancy and expensive bottles came on the scene.

In an attempt to understand this bottled water phenomena I decided to put the words "bottled" and "water" into the search engine on my computer. The first entry that came up surprised me greatly. There is a whole association dedicated to bottled water; a whole business geared up to its welfare. I mean I can understand the International Association for Rail Workers or for Medical Supplies, but the International Bottled Water Association (IBWA) shocked me to the core. After this surprise I noticed that the whole Industry is massive, that not only this association exists but so do hundreds of others! Wow!

Anyway, it matters not. Looking through the IBWA site for inspiration I came to their "tip of the week" page. And here is the tip that they had for this week:

"Cool water is absorbed much more quickly than warm fluids and may help to cool off your overheated body". Source: Nutrition Information Center in partnership with IBWA

Handy stuff! I got another useful hint from some other association that told me to drink two glasses of water every morning to offset imperceptible water loss that I have had during the night. Excellent stuff. This "handy tip" was given out by a Dr Fereydon Batmanghelidj and he wrote a book called, Your Body's Many Cries for Water. I doubt that it is fictional in content.

Must try and get hold of that book - only joking. Another piece that I found was Ed Ford's views on the matter of water:

"Human beings were invented by water as a device for transporting itself from one place to another".

I am completely stuck for something to say after reading that weird statement. I must move onto other things or I will end up trying to find this man to see if he is for real.

As a kid in Edinburgh (which is not that long ago) we always used to drink water from the tap. If you wanted a glass of water then go to the kitchen sink and open the cold tap, let it run for a few seconds, more to make it cold than to clear the line and then fill your glass. Final step: drink it. This was always the case and 99% of the population of Britain (one percent lived on whisky) lived quite happily in this way with no notable side-effects form the tap water. And then suddenly bottled water came on the scene and life changed without noticeable falter, now 100% of the population drink from bottles.

Edinburgh Water shocks a lot of people when they find out the cycle that it goes through before it arrives in the glass that they are busy drinking from. Recycled sewage water is the ingredient of the stuff now inside their stomachs at the point when they grasp what you are telling them.

Edinburgh has for many years removed the dung from the sewage (this used to be shipped out to sea in a special ship called the Gardyloo), it is then treated and passed through charcoal beds and retreated and analyzed endlessly before it is sent back into the system. And believe it or not Edinburgh has some of the highest quality water in Europe - and it comes straight from the tap!

Countries like Taiwan, the Philippines to name but a few do need treated water as the quality available from the tap could kill at ten yards. Taiwan has an extremely efficient system going - just go outside of your house to any one of the many machines dotted along the streets and by putting in 5NTD (8 pence) you will get a few gallons of clean and drinkable water in return. Not that the tap water is that bad (some waste chemicals and untreated sewage have been diverted to another river) and a boil in the kettle does me perfectly if I am feeling lazy.

(click to enlarge)

facts about bottled water

It seems to me as if the whole world is shifting water around constantly. Singapore is a good example of the state of water today. Singapore has to buy water from Malaysia to survive and without such the whole of the Singapore economy would grind to a halt. This water is actually under serious contention as Malaysia has been complaining that Singapore does not pay enough for the water they pump everyday.

The Malaysian state of Johor provides 350 million gallons of water per day to Singapore at $0.007 per 1000 gallons, while Singapore has to resell a minimum 17 million gallons per day of treated water to Johor at $0.13 per 1000 gallons. The price differential has prompted calls from numerous Malaysian politicians that Singapore is profiteering from the deal.

It also rankles the Malaysians that the price paid was derived from an agreement made decades ago and is still due to run for another few (until 2061). In basis: they want more for the water and Singapore doesn't want to pay. They are even threatening to go to war over this!

In an attempt by Singapore to reduce their reliance on Malaysia they have started a program to build recycling plants around the Island. Great idea -convert dirty water into drinking water - and although it will take many years before the balance changes it is a good start. I am not sure about their marketing campaign - you can buy this water from the chosen outlets and it is called "New Water". Sounds like a religious order.

The worlds shifting of water (despite Ed Ford's thinking that water made humans so that it can transport itself) is none greater than what is going on in China as we speak. The Three Gorges Dam! China's largest project since the Great Wall of China: and one with greater impact on China and the rest of the world than any other project underway today.

Some facts about the Three Gorges project:

  • Project took 17 years; completion was in 2009.
  • An estimated 250,000 workers are involved in the project.
  • The Three Gorges Reservoir inundates 632 square kilometers (395 square miles) of land.
  • An estimated 1.2 million people have been resettled by the dam.
  • The project's 26 hydropower turbines are expected to produce up to one-ninth of China's output, 18.2 million kilowatts.
  • The amount of concrete totals 26.43 million cubic meters, twice that of the Itaipu project in Brazil, currently the world's largest hydroelectric dam.

Source: Chinese government

Alongside of this massive shifting of natural resources we have the ice caps melting North and South of us, floods occurring worldwide where they should not and abnormal rainfalls flooding towns that usually do not see water for months on end. And of course the Meeting of Nations on the Supermarket shelves!

The world has water on the brain!

Just make sure that when you buy water from the supermarket that you try and miss out the "Clouds Recycled with Flouride" and the "Occaneechi Local Spa" and maybe go for the Deep Rock Crystal Drop and Whistlers Pure Glacial. It's all in a name!
About The Author: Author and Webmaster of Seamania. As a Chief Engineer in the Merchant Navy Ieuan Dolby has sailed the world for fifteen years. Now living in Taiwan he writes about cultures across the globe and life as he sees it.

Add a comment

Last Updated (Thursday, 15 July 2010 23:03)

 

postheadericon Oil is War, War is Oil. End both.

BP declares war on life on earth.

Almost three months now, with damage predicted for at least three decades, BP's war on all life is now a rounding success...

So it turns out with the placement of a better cap, that BP CAN stop the leak. Makes one wonder what motivated them to do so? Could it be the Coast Guard's insistence that "enough is enough", a magic command being all it took to do the job right?

I suspect something more sinister. Something lawyerly.

I mean, it makes sense that since it had already cost BP $700 million to drill to the point of the explosion, that they'd want to recover that investment by aiming to recover the well as opposed to plugging it. (And to just think, a $500k acoustic blowout preventer would have saved them tens of billions in clean up costs, makes me think of that ol' British saying; Pennywise and Pound Foolish).

But back to the lawyerliness... Now that there's a cap, the rate of flow per hour can finally be calculated to the micro-liter, and with each gallon earns them a resultant fine, the expense of which is going to be massive... all of which goes a long way towards explaining BP's extraordinary efforts to keep it away from the public's eyes. From not allowing clean up workers to wear respirators (makes it look toxic); to ordering journalists away under penalty of arrest; to staging fake clean-up photo-ops and simply covering the oil-stained beaches with clean sand instead of doing the job right.

And that's just near the shore...

Out at sea, there's the Corexit, a poisonous toxin (four times more toxic than crude oil and another product of the petroleum industry). Pumped into the oceans by the hundreds of millions of gallons to hide the death and destruction from the cameras in the sky... they would rather hide it than correct it... But why would they do this? Well ladies and gentlemen... cover up, yes, there has been a cover up, and if you have any doubt, just check out "What BP Hid: Our Gulf In Peril" by PuppetGov.com:

After watching such scenes, its understandable you might want to "tune it out" as I imagine the citizens of Hiroshima might have wanted to "tune out" their burning eyeballs and slouching off skin. But you MUSN'T. This is our fate, the fate of our planet. This effects ALL OF US. The oceans are our lungs, and they've just had billion of gallons of poison geysered down their esophagus. No, it is time to begin THINKING, and thinking begins with awareness.

First step; Get off oil. Sell the car. Live in an neighborhood near your work, cycle, shop, support your local businesses. The less oil in transport, the less extraction needed for manufacture, which itself can evolve to more sustainable ingredients. Don't give me that "how do you think they made that computer you're writing on?" bullcrap, two-thirds of oil goes to transport.

Second step; Demand political accountability. As big a joke as democracy has become, it is still marginally functional, and high time to re-imprint what it really means, so vote in leaders who will do right by the Earth and not just corporate interests. The West needs to vote in leaders who will immediately end our "wars" in Iraq and Afghanistan. These so-called "wars" are nothing more than ways for corporate defense contractors to reap billions from war profiteering at our expense.

The "war" in Afghanistan is not winnable. You are dealing with proudly backwards Muslim illiterates. If we really want to get rid of Al Queda and the Taliban hiding in the mountains then just cluster bomb up and down the border with Pakistan and then do it over and over again until there is nowhere left to hide.

Better yet, because of all the new minerals that have been discovered there, let China have all the rights to these and they will surely take care of the Muslims in rapid order, and it would be far better to have the Muslims angrier at China than the West. China does not have the same "moral" constraints that we soft Westerners have, they will do what is necessary when it comes to the evil sect of Radical Islam and its suicidal followers.

Sounds cynical, I know, and I point it out as only the unavoidable end progression of the current path. So why not something better, something less cynical?

Take those war budgets and put at least $500 billion a year (at least) into solar, wind and other clean electric technologies, then strip the oil industry of every last damn subsidy they undeservedly suck up and we'll feel the real cost of that oil addiction. Let Europe and America subsidize instead the manufacture of cheap electric, hydrogen, and air compression types of cars that already have been invented, which everyone can afford, and eliminate our need for oil and the huge deficits that oil wars cost. If we are going to go in debt I would rather it be done for sustainable renewable non-polluting energy than giving it to gamblers/bankers and their Wall Street bookies.

We should also do more solar and wind on the community level. A town of roughly 10,000 can get by on a solar array of about five acres. At the very least, outfit all homes with solar so that they draw from this and supply excess to the grid. Also if we do power generation on the Distributed Generation approach, it would be far less costly versus the big solar plants. Most cities, excepting maybe the largest like Los Angeles, New York, London, etc., have approximately 5 to 10 acres of usable land per 10,000 population to build on the community level, and then add on by outfitting home roofs and we will be set.

We need to start thinking about the future and getting big oil out of our pockets. This will also get rid of our "need" to be involved with the Medieval East, funding these Islamic regimes with our money for their oil so they can continue their goal of building a Global Challiphiate, which is really their end goal, at least according to their book and actions.

Let us end war by ending our need for oil, and end oil, by ending our need for war. The two go hand in hand...


Add a comment

Last Updated (Wednesday, 14 July 2010 04:57)

 

postheadericon Breast Cancer and Dairy Products!

Dairy causes cancer

Why I believe that giving up milk is the key to beating breast cancer... I had no alternative but to die or to try to find a cure for myself. I am a scientist - surely there was a rational explanation for this cruel illness that affects one in 12 women in the UK?

I had suffered the loss of one breast, and undergone radiotherapy. I was now receiving painful chemotherapy, and had been seen by some of the country's most eminent specialists. But, deep down, I felt certain I was facing death. I had a loving husband, a beautiful home and two young children to care for. I desperately wanted to live. Fortunately, this desire drove me to unearth the facts, some of which were known only to a handful of scientists at the time.

Anyone who has come into contact with breast cancer will know that certain risk factors - such as increasing age, early onset of womanhood, late onset of menopause and a family history of breast cancer - are completely out of our control. But there are many risk factors, which we can control easily. These 'controllable' risk factors readily translate into simple changes that we can all make in our day-to-day lives to help prevent or treat breast cancer.

My message is that even advanced breast cancer can be overcome because I have done it. The first clue to understanding what was promoting my breast cancer came when my husband Peter, who was also a scientist, arrived back from working in China while I was being plugged in for a chemotherapy session. He had brought with him cards and letters, as well as some amazing herbal suppositories, sent by my friends and science colleagues in China.

The suppositories were sent to me as a cure for breast cancer. Despite the awfulness of the situation, we both had a good belly laugh, and I remember saying that this was the treatment for breast cancer in China, then it was little wonder that Chinese women avoided getting the disease. Those words echoed in my mind.

Why didn't Chinese women get breast cancer?

I had collaborated once with Chinese colleagues on a study of links between soil chemistry and disease, and I remembered some of the statistics. The disease was virtually non-existent throughout the whole country. Only one in 10,000 women in China will die from it, compared to that terrible figure of one in 12 in Britain and the even grimmer average of one in 10 across most Western countries.

It is not just a matter of China being a more rural country, with less urban pollution. In highly urbanized Hong Kong, the rate rises to 34 women in every 10,000 but still puts the West to shame. The Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have similar rates. And remember, both cities were attacked with nuclear weapons, so in addition to the usual pollution-related cancers, one would also expect to find some radiation-related cases, too.

The conclusion we can draw from these statistics strikes you with some force. If a Western woman were to move to industrialized, irradiated Hiroshima, she would slash her risk of contracting breast cancer by half. Obviously this is absurd. It seemed obvious to me that some lifestyle factor not related to pollution, urbanization or the environment is seriously increasing the Western woman's chance of contracting breast cancer.

I then discovered that whatever causes the huge differences in breast cancer rates between oriental and Western countries, it isn't genetic. Scientific research showed that when Chinese or Japanese people move to the West, within one or two generations their rates of breast cancer approach those of their host community.

The same thing happens when oriental people adopt a completely Western lifestyle in Hong Kong. In fact, the slang name for breast cancer in China translates as 'Rich Woman's Disease'. This is because, in China, only the better off can afford to eat what is termed 'Hong Kong food'. The Chinese describe all Western food, including everything from ice cream and chocolate bars to spaghetti and feta cheese, as 'Hong Kong food', because of its availability in the former British colony and its scarcity, in the past, in mainland China.

So it made perfect sense to me that whatever was causing my breast cancer and the shockingly high incidence in this country generally, it was almost certainly something to do with our better-off, middle-class, Western lifestyle. There is an important point for men here, too. I have observed in my research that much of the the data about prostate cancer leads to similar conclusions.

According to figures from the World Health Organization, the number of men contracting prostate cancer in rural China is negligible, only 0.5 men in every 100,000. In England, Scotland and Wales, however, this figure is 70 times higher. Like breast cancer, it is a middle-class disease that primarily attacks the wealthier and higher socio-economic groups - those that can afford to eat rich foods.

I remember saying to my husband - 'Come on Peter, you have just come back from China. What is it about the Chinese way of life that is so different. Why don't they get breast cancer?' We decided to utilize our joint scientific backgrounds and approach it logically. We examined scientific data that pointed us in the general direction of fats in diets.

Researchers had discovered in the 1980s that only l4% of calories in the average Chinese diet were from fat, compared to almost 36% in the West. But the diet I had been living on for years before I contracted breast cancer was very low in fat and high in fibre. Besides, I knew as a scientist that fat intake in adults has not been shown to increase risk for breast cancer in most investigations that have followed large groups of women for up to a dozen years.

Then one day something rather special happened. Peter and I have worked together so closely over the years that I am not sure which one of us first said: 'The Chinese don't eat dairy produce!' It is hard to explain to a non-scientist the sudden mental and emotional 'buzz' you get when you know you have had an important insight. It's as if you have had a lot of pieces of a jigsaw in your mind, and suddenly, in a few seconds, they all fall into place and the whole picture is clear.

Suddenly I recalled how many Chinese people were physically unable to tolerate milk, how the Chinese people I had worked with had always said that milk was only for babies, and how one of my close friends, who is of Chinese origin, always politely turned down the cheese course at dinner parties. I knew of no Chinese people who lived a traditional Chinese life who ever used cow or other dairy food to feed their babies. The tradition was to use a wet nurse but never, ever, dairy products.

Culturally, the Chinese find our Western preoccupation with milk and milk products very strange. I remember entertaining a large delegation of Chinese scientists shortly after the ending of the Cultural Revolution in the 1980s. On advice from the Foreign Office, we had asked the caterer to provide a pudding that contained a lot of ice cream. After inquiring what the pudding consisted of, all of the Chinese, including their interpreter, politely but firmly refused to eat it, and they could not be persuaded to change their minds. At the time we were all delighted and ate extra portions!

Milk, I discovered, is one of the most common causes of food allergies. Over 70% of the world's population are unable to digest the milk sugar, lactose, which has led nutritionists to believe that this is the normal condition for adults, not some sort of deficiency. Perhaps nature is trying to tell us that we are eating the wrong food.

Before I had breast cancer for the first time, I had eaten a lot of dairy produce, such as skimmed milk, low-fat cheese and yoghurt. I had used it as my main source of protein. I also ate cheap but lean minced beef, which I now realized was probably often ground-up dairy cow. In order to cope with the chemotherapy I received for my fifth case of cancer, I had been eating organic yoghurts as a way of helping my digestive tract to recover and repopulate my gut with 'good' bacteria.

Recently, I discovered that way back in 1989 yoghurt had been implicated in ovarian cancer. Dr Daniel Cramer of Harvard University studied hundreds of women with ovarian cancer, and had them record in detail what they normally ate. Wish I'd been made aware of his findings when he had first discovered them. Following Peter's and my insight into the Chinese diet, I decided to give up not just yoghurt but all dairy produce immediately.

Cheese, butter, milk and yoghurt and anything else that contained dairy produce - it went down the sink or in the rubbish. It is surprising how many products, including commercial soups, biscuits and cakes, contain some form of dairy produce. Even many proprietary brands of margarine marketed as soya, sunflower or olive oil spreads can contain dairy produce. I therefore became an avid reader of the small print on food labels.

Up to this point, I had been steadfastly measuring the progress of my fifth cancerous lump with callipers and plotting the results. Despite all the encouraging comments and positive feedback from my doctors and nurses, my own precise observations told me the bitter truth. My first chemotherapy sessions had produced no effect - the lump was still the same size. Then I eliminated dairy products. Within days, the lump started to shrink.

About two weeks after my second chemotherapy session and one week after giving up dairy produce, the lump in my neck started to itch. Then it began to soften and to reduce in size. The line on the graph, which had shown no change, was now pointing downwards as the tumour got smaller and smaller. And, very significantly, I noted that instead of declining exponentially (a graceful curve) as cancer is meant to do, the tumour's decrease in size was plotted on a straight line heading off the bottom of the graph, indicating a cure, not suppression (or remission) of the tumour.

One Saturday afternoon after about six weeks of excluding all dairy produce from my diet, I practised an hour of meditation then felt for what was left of the lump. I couldn't find it. Yet I was very experienced at detecting cancerous lumps - I had discovered all five cancers on my own. I went downstairs and asked my husband to feel my neck. He could not find any trace of the lump either. On the following Thursday I was due to be seen by my cancer specialist at Charing Cross Hospital in London. He examined me thoroughly, especially my neck where the tumour had been. He was initially bemused and then delighted as he said, "I cannot find it."

None of my doctors, it appeared, had expected someone with my type and stage of cancer (which had clearly spread to the lymph system) to survive, let alone be so hale and hearty. My specialist was as overjoyed as I was. When I first discussed my ideas with him he was understandably skeptical. But I understand that he now uses maps showing cancer mortality in China in his lectures, and recommends a non-dairy diet to his cancer patients.

I now believe that the link between dairy produce and breast cancer is similar to the link between smoking and lung cancer. I believe that identifying the link between breast cancer and dairy produce, and then developing a diet specifically targeted at maintaining the health of my breast and hormone system, cured me.

It was difficult for me, as it may be for you, to accept that a substance as 'natural' as milk might have such ominous health implications. But I am a living proof that it works and, starting from tomorrow, I shall reveal the secrets of my revolutionary action plan (in my book).
Extracted from Your Life In Your Hands : Understanding, Preventing, and Overcoming Breast Cancer by Professor Jane A. Plant

Add a comment

Last Updated (Saturday, 10 July 2010 05:08)

 

postheadericon Dead Ocean Future

Fish dead from hypoxia

The estimated super high-pressure release of oil from under the earth's crust is between 80,000 to 100,000 barrels per day... that is equal to about an average of 6.3 Olympic sized swimming pools per DAY of crude oil geysering into the world's oceans.


Add a comment

Last Updated (Tuesday, 15 June 2010 17:28)

Read more...

 
More Articles...
Thinknovation
Karl's Weird News
Karl's Weird News
Links to weird, twisted and disturbing news for your entertainment and contemplation
  • Memo to Ferrari designers: Dont use flammable glue near the engine!
    Ferrari Recalls 1,248 Cars due to Fire Hazard Ferrari says it is recalling 1,248 of its 458 Italia supercars after reports of fires breaking out in five of the luxury vehicles in several countries. The Italian carmaker said Thursday it wants to replace an adhesive that in some circumstances can ...
  • Today it is Russia, tomorrow it will be your country
    'People should smoke and drink more’, says Russian finance ministerRussia’s finance minister has told people to smoke and drink more, explaining that higher consumption would help lift tax revenues for spending on social services. Speaking as the Russian government announces plan to raise duty on alcohol and cigarettes, ...
  • You play with fire, you’re gonna get burnt
    Mysterious death of Russian military intelligence high-up in Syria Gen. Yuri Ivanov, 52, deputy head of GRU, the Russian military's overseas intelligence arm of Russian military, was found dead in mysterious circumstances described in a terse official Russian eulogy as a tragic swimming ...
Humanifesto
Seeking alternatives for developing autonomous regeneration of the environment? Tired of pollution causing damaging weather changes because of the choices we citizens make? The climate is our commons; it is the root of the world's communities. Deep thinking will be needed, depending on the dilemma facing Earth. Ecological and economic matters will suffer equally from our emission-based energies. Energy has lasting environmental impacts, something environmentalist groups have warned about for years. Environmentalists are not just people passing moral judgment, they are just keenly aware that resources are finite. Food, fossil fuels and the markets, are global as is their impact. How great it would be if we could green the earth and grow the economy? A cleaner environment contributes to better health, helping us begins by learning how industrial activities can merge into the ecologically sound lifestyle. There is no limit on what we can do if we keep in mind local impact of our production with the moral clarity of our obligation to protect Mother Nature. A new organic Participatory ecology is forming; we can no longer turn blind eyes to the actions of those who pollute. We can preserve future growth by recognizing the problems, establishing protocols, and setting benchmarks for recognizing pollution reduction. Instead of exploiting the earth's natural resources, we will rely on renewable resources to save our legacy. If this makes sense to you, and you're serious about finding a solution for earth restoring technological advances, we'd love to hear your thoughts. Share with us ideas, problems, experiences with new technologies and environmental trends about restoring nature's right to clean water and abundant wildlife.
Recommended:

Osocio.org - Social advertising and non-profit campaigns from around the globe

The Molecular Biology of Paradise

Green Design will Save the World

The Venus Project is dedicated to confronting all of these problems by actively engaging in the research, development, and application of workable solutions to today's problems